- #Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom full#
- #Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom software#
- #Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom plus#
So after two months I am really happy with the transition and I don't I will go back. They are not as polished on the surface but the developers are putting way more powerful tools into them.
#Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom software#
Seems open source imaging software compares to commercial offerings the same way Linux compares to Windows or Mac. So after two months I am really happy with the transition and I don't think I will go back. Tagging is great, it's fast, it has geotagging and search is excellent. It's really nice once you understand the UI. Darktable requires a totally different way of thinking compared to C1 but once you adapt there is an enormous amount of interesting features to do things you couldn't imagine doing in C1. But after a few weeks I am starting to get the hang of it. The learning curve is really steep and the UI of both is not as polished as Capture One or other commercial apps. So I decided to try Darktable for editing and Digikam for DAM. I always wanted to switch to Linux but Capture One kept me on the Mac. What would I win by doing all the culling and metadata edition in digiKam? The metadata fields available since darktable 3 and its handling are all what I need.When Capture 21 came out I got a little bit frustrated with the lack of new features and the steady price increases so I decided to look around for alternatives. I’ve yet to explore an equivalent workflow that includes digiKam, and I don’t know if it’s worth the effort. As this is managed by a preset on the export module, all it’s done automatically.
#Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom full#
On export, I use darktable’s metadata editor to replace the full code (5m resolution) by a shorter code (5km resolution) or to remove it altogether.
#Digikam vs darktable vs lightroom plus#
Images meant for archiving get all the metadata, images for sharing get only a public subset.Īn example: I add a tag with the plus code to each image. I can add all the metadata to the XMP file, including private data as people names and GPS coordinates, and decide on export just what data I want to keep on the JPG, depending on the target. The single most important reason was introduced in darktable 3: the export metadata editor. But all my metadata edition is done in darktable. However, if darktable’s asset management was a bit closer to what is implemented in Lightroom, I’m not sure I would have a large need for digiKam.Įdit: Although all the features I use digiKam for are available in darktable, I find that importing/organizing/culling are much quicker in digiKam on my aging machine.Ĭurrently I use digiKam only as a search database (a very powerful one), where I add all the images before and after edition. I suppose I don’t typically care whether my edits from darktable appear in digiKam, as I use it primarily for keeping my photos organized. Select all images and write metadata to files.Select all images with less than 3 stars and delete.View each image fullscreen(or zoom to 100% if necessary) and assign a rating.Import directly from SD card into digiKam.I’m curious to see how the changes from digiKam 7.0.0 and darktable 3.2.0 effect my workflow, and I’m also eager to hear how everyone else approaches this from an asset management perspective.Īs my lenses are rather soft, and I shoot a fair amount of action of my wife’s sporting competitions, I typically import a large number of images which need to be heavily culled. I just upgraded to digiKam 7.0.0, and I don’t remember which version I was using before that, I just know it wasn’t the latest. I’ve personally been using digiKam + darktable for the past 6 months.
0 kommentar(er)
